The Georgia IP Litigation Blog monitors patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases pending in Georgia federal district courts and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta. The blog alerts readers to initiation of such cases in the district courts and summarizes relevant orders and opinions from each covered court.
On February 5, 2014, Rolex Watch U.S.A.,Inc. (“Rolex”) of New York, New York, filed a complaint against Nicholas Peter Karettis (“the defendant”) of Tyrone, Georgia, alleging Trademark Counterfeiting and Infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114.
The complaint alleges Mr. Karettis sold, offered for sale, distributed, promoted, and advertised merchandise that was counterfeit and infringing upon Rolex’s federally registered trademarks.
Rolex owns numerous trademarks and trade names including at least the following:
CROWN DEVICE (design) Registration no. 657,756 Registered on 1/28/1958 for timepieces of all kinds and parts thereof.
DATEJUST Registration no. 674,177 Registered on 2/17/1959 for timepieces and parts thereof.
DAY-DATE Registration no. 831,652 Registered on 7/4/1967 for wrist watches.
DAYTONA Registration no. 2,331,145 Registered on 3/21/2000 for watches.
EXPLORER Registration no. 2,518,894 Registered on 12/18/2001 for watches.
EXPLORER II Registration no. 2,445,357 Registered on 4/24/2001 for watches.
GMT-MASTER Registration no. 683,249 Registered on 8/11/1959 for watches.
GMT-MASTER II Registration no. 2,985,308 Registered on 8/16/2005 for watches and parts thereof.
OYSTER Registration no. 239,383 Registered on 3/6/28 for watches, movements, cases, dials, and other parts of watches.
OYSTER PERPETUAL Registration no. 1,105,602 Registered on 11/7/1978 for watches and parts thereof.
PRESIDENT Registration no. 520,309 Registered on 1/24/1950 for wristbands and bracelets for watches made wholly or in part or plated with precious metals, sold separately from watches.
ROLEX Registration no. 101,819 Registered on 1/12/1915 for watches, clocks, parts of watches and clocks, and their cases.
ROLEX DAYTONA Registration no. 1,960,768 Registered on 3/5/1996 for watches.
ROLEX DEEP SEA Registration no. 3,703,603 Registered on 10/27/2009 for watches.
SEA-DWELLER Registration no. 860,527 Registered on 11/19/1968 for watches, clocks and parts thereof.
SUBMARINER Registration no. 1,782,604 Registered on 7/20/1993 for watches.
TURN-O-GRAPH Registration no. 2,950,028 Registered on 5/10/2005 for watches and parts thereof.
YACHTMASTER Registration no. 1,749,374 Registered on 1/26/1993 for watches.
The Rolex Crown Device design
According to the complaint, Rolex discovered a classified advertisement appearing on the website “www.craigslist.org” (“Craigslist”) advertising for sale watches bearing counterfeits and infringements of the Rolex Registered Trademarks. These watches were allegedly advertised as “AAA Quality Replica” watches and listed for sale at a price of $200.
Also according to the complaint, Rolex forwarded the Craigslist add to its private investigator who then called the number provided on the advertisement and arranged a meeting with a man identifying himself as “Nick.” Rolex’s investigator also arranged for members of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department to be present at this meeting. At the meeting, members of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department arrested the defendant and seized five (5) watches identified by Rolex’s investigator as bearing counterfeits and infringements of the Rolex Registered Trademarks.
Thereafter, the defendant was charged with forged or counterfeited trademarks, service marks, or copyrighted or registered designs, constituting unauthorized reproductions as defined in O.C.G.A. § 10-1-454. Defendant’s vehicle was impounded and the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department seized $14,800.00 in cash found on the defendant’s person at the time of his arrest.
The complaint further alleges irreparable harm, unjust enrichment, willful and malicious infringement, and that the case is exceptional under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) because of the defendant’s alleged reckless disregard or willful blindness in connection with unlawful activities.
Rolex seeks an injunction and treble damages or statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c). Rolex also seeks legal and investigative fees along with any further relief as the court deems just and proper.
The case is Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Karettis No. 3:14-cv-12-TCB filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division on February 5, 2014, and is assigned to Judge Timothy C. Batten.